AnalyseElmarkedErhverv

Danish SME Energy Cost Index: Comprehensive Data Foundation

Energiguide Analyse2026-02-077 min
Danish SME Energy Cost Index: Comprehensive Data Foundation
Last updated: 2026-02-16

Danish SME Energy Cost Index: Comprehensive Data Foundation

Denmark's 389,000 SMEs face a complex electricity cost landscape where location, sector, and contract choice can create 25% or greater cost differences. This first-of-its-kind benchmarking analysis reveals that Danish business electricity prices have stabilized at €70-71/MWh (2024 average) following the 2022 crisis peak of €215/MWh—yet new volatility from the PICASSO balancing market and record negative price hours are reshaping optimization opportunities. For businesses consuming 50,000-3,000,000 kWh annually, understanding regional tariff variations, sector-specific load profiles, and emerging flexibility markets can unlock 15-35% cost reductions.


Current electricity prices have normalized but volatility persists

Danish wholesale electricity prices averaged 70.6 EUR/MWh in DK1 (West Denmark) and 70.9 EUR/MWh in DK2 (East Denmark) during 2024—the lowest since 2020 and representing a 67% decline from the 2022 crisis peak. This stabilization masks growing intraday volatility: December 2024 saw day-ahead prices spike to 395 EUR/MWh during low wind periods, while negative price hours reached record levels.

The complete cost structure for a typical SME consuming 500,000 kWh annually breaks down as follows:

ComponentRate (excl. VAT)Annual Cost (DKK)Share of Total
Spot price (2024 avg)~50 øre/kWh250,00048%
Network tariff (Radius)~34 øre/kWh170,00033%
Energinet TSO tariff~10 øre/kWh50,00010%
Supplier margin~2-5 øre/kWh10,000-25,0003%
Electricity tax (after refund)0.4 øre/kWh2,0000.4%
Total~97 øre/kWh~483,000100%

VAT-registered businesses benefit from the 0.4 øre/kWh effective electricity tax after refunds, while non-VAT registered entities (banks, certain healthcare) pay the full 72.7 øre/kWh (2025 rate). A significant policy change arrives in 2026-2027 when electricity tax drops to the EU minimum of 0.8 øre/kWh for all consumers.


Network tariffs create substantial regional cost differences

The implementation of Tariff Model 3.0 nationwide in 2024 introduced time-differentiated network tariffs that create dramatic pricing variations—both geographically and temporally. Peak hours (17:00-21:00) cost up to 10 times more than overnight periods across all grid companies.

Grid CompanyRegionOff-Peak (00-06)Peak (17-21)Annual Difference vs Cheapest
HammelCentral Jutland6.94 øre/kWh62.40 øre/kWhBaseline (cheapest)
KonstantSouthern Jutland7.00 øre/kWh66.00 øre/kWh+6%
N1Jutland (largest)11.00 øre/kWh98.00 øre/kWh+57%
RadiusCopenhagen12.20 øre/kWh109.82 øre/kWh+76%
CeriusZealand13.88 øre/kWh124.91 øre/kWh+100%
TREFOR ØstBornholm18.00 øre/kWh165.00 øre/kWh+164%

For an SME consuming 100,000 kWh annually, location alone creates a cost difference of ~21,000 DKK between Jutland (Konstant) and Copenhagen (Radius), expanding to ~47,000 DKK versus Bornholm. Energinet's transmission tariffs remain uniform nationwide at 13.5 øre/kWh (2025), representing an 8% increase from 2024.


Sector consumption profiles reveal optimization potential

Danish business electricity consumption totals approximately 18.4 TWh annually, with manufacturing (8.1 TWh) and services (9.5 TWh) as the dominant sectors. Load profile analysis reveals substantial differences in flexibility potential across industries.

Manufacturing accounts for 26% of national electricity consumption with 34.5% of total manufacturing energy coming from electricity—up from 27.1% in 1990. The sector shows relatively flat 24-hour profiles for continuous operations but standard weekday peaks (06:00-18:00) for single-shift operations. Energy intensity has improved dramatically, falling 64.1% since 1990 through efficiency investments.

Commercial and public services consume 28% of Denmark's electricity, with retail trade alone accounting for 4.86 TWh (2023). Key consumption drivers include refrigeration (14% of commercial electricity), lighting, and HVAC systems. Service sector buildings show the sharpest peak-to-trough variation, with consumption dropping 40-50% on weekends versus weekdays.

Agriculture (6.0 TWh) demonstrates the highest flexibility potential for time-of-use optimization, with research indicating farms "stand to gain from time-of-use pricing" due to schedulable loads like irrigation, grain drying, and climate control. Seasonal patterns align with growing cycles, with peak consumption during livestock heating season and post-harvest grain drying.

Energy intensity benchmarks for building planning:

  • Efficient offices: 128 kWh/m²/year
  • Average offices: 166 kWh/m²/year
  • Retail stores (median): 84 kWh/m²/year (electricity only)
  • Grocery stores: 416-798 kWh/m²/year (high refrigeration load)

Price volatility has entered a new phase with PICASSO

The launch of the European PICASSO balancing platform on October 2, 2024 has introduced extreme price spikes into Danish balancing markets. While day-ahead prices have stabilized, aFRR (automatic frequency restoration) prices reached 4,618 EUR/MWh on February 12, 2025—over 65 times typical wholesale levels.

Negative price hours hit record levels in 2024: 375 hours in DK1 and 275 hours in DK2, representing a 27% increase over 2023. These occur predominantly during high wind periods, sunny daytime hours, and low-demand weekends. Denmark's 84% renewable generation share (2024) drives this phenomenon, with wind providing 59% and solar 11% of production.

The peak-to-off-peak spread creates substantial optimization value. Grid tariff differentials alone reach 35 øre/kWh between night and evening periods; combined with spot price variation, total spreads of 50-200+ øre/kWh occur during volatile periods. Danish households have already responded, showing a "clear development from 2020 to 2023 with significant drop in peak consumption and increase in night consumption."

New imbalance pricing rules effective March 18, 2025 incorporate PICASSO aFRR prices when activation direction aligns with mFRR direction, expected to significantly increase imbalance price volatility. Energinet projects balancing capacity needs will double by 2030.


Danish electricity prices rank third-highest in the EU

For SME-relevant consumption bands (500-2,000 MWh annually), Denmark's business electricity prices track close to the EU average of €0.1902/kWh but with substantial tax burdens. Danish household electricity prices rank third-highest in Europe at €0.3485/kWh (H1 2025), trailing only Germany (€0.3843) and Belgium (€0.3571).

CountryNon-Household Price (€/kWh)vs EU Average
Ireland€0.2726+43% (highest)
Italy€0.2336+23%
Germany~€0.22+16%
Denmark€0.18-0.20~EU average
Netherlands~€0.16-16%
Sweden€0.0964-49%
Finland€0.0804-58% (lowest)

Denmark's 47.7% tax share in household electricity prices represents the highest in the EU. However, the effective business rate benefits from VAT recovery and electricity tax refunds, making Danish industry more competitive than household price comparisons suggest. Pre-crisis (2019), Danish industry paid approximately €0.08/kWh—below the EU average of €0.12/kWh.


SME statistics reveal market structure and contract preferences

Denmark's approximately 389,000 SMEs represent 99.7% of all businesses and employ 64.1% of the private sector workforce (~1.06 million FTEs). The SME segment grew 6.3% from 2019-2023, with medium-sized firms (50-249 employees) showing the highest relative growth.

Contract type distribution has shifted dramatically post-energy crisis:

  • Spot price contracts: ~50% market share (increasing)
  • Fixed price contracts: ~30-35% (decreasing due to limited supply)
  • Variable price contracts: ~15-20% (stable)
  • Hybrid strategies: Popular hedging approach combining 50% spot with 50% fixed

The Danish retail market features ~40 active electricity retailers with low barriers to entry and no switching costs for consumers. Nearly 100% smart meter coverage enables true hourly settlement. Maximum lock-in periods are capped at 6 months for households, though no corresponding limit exists for SME contracts.

For energy consumption classifications, EUROSTAT Band IC (500-2,000 MWh/year) represents the primary SME benchmark, encompassing medium enterprises. Large consumers exceeding 100 GWh annually qualify for a 90% reduction on system tariffs.


Market forecasts point to continued transition challenges

Price forecasts for 2025-2027 indicate baseload prices in the €40-65/MWh range, with substantial uncertainty from weather patterns, interconnector availability, and accelerating electrification. Nordic Credit Rating analysis warns Denmark could face supply deficits in 2026-2027 unless new renewable projects complete on schedule.

Viking Link (1.4 GW UK interconnector, operational December 2023) is estimated to increase DK1 prices by approximately €3.70/MWh in 2025, though this effect diminishes to ~€0.50 by 2028 as the market adjusts. Full capacity operation awaits West Coast Line completion in Q1 2025.

Major infrastructure developments reshaping the market include:

  • Bornholm Energy Island: 3 GW offshore wind by 2030, €645M EU funding secured
  • Offshore wind targets: 14 GW by 2030 (currently 2.7 GW), though Rystad projects 9 GW more realistic
  • Data center demand: Projected to reach 15% of Danish electricity consumption by 2030 (from <1% currently)
  • Grid investment: DKK 10.5 billion Siemens Energy contract for 50 new substations over 8 years

Cost optimization opportunities for SMEs range from 15-35%

The combination of time-differentiated tariffs, volatile spot prices, and emerging flexibility markets creates multiple optimization pathways for Danish SMEs.

Time-of-use optimization offers the most accessible savings. Shifting consumption from peak (17:00-21:00) to off-peak (21:00-06:00) periods captures network tariff spreads of ~35 øre/kWh plus spot price differentials. Sectors with high flexibility include cold storage, HVAC systems, water pumping, and EV fleet charging. Research indicates load shifting from thermostatic loads "is more profitable than mFRR provision in Denmark."

Flexibility market participation through aggregators enables SMEs to access ancillary service revenues previously restricted to large generators. Minimum FCR bids have been reduced to 1 MW (from 10 MW), making aggregated participation feasible. Companies like Sympower (2.7 GW under management) and Centrica Business Solutions facilitate commercial demand response, with typical revenue splits of 70-80% to the customer.

Energy efficiency subsidies through the Erhvervspuljen program offer up to 50% coverage of eligible project costs, with DKK 3.9 billion allocated through 2029. High-ROI projects include LED lighting (1-3 year payback), heat pumps (3-7 years), and variable speed drives on motors (2-4 years).

PPA opportunities remain challenging for individual SMEs, as most corporate PPAs require minimum volumes of 10-100 GWh—above the 3 GWh ceiling for businesses consuming 3,000,000 kWh annually. Aggregated PPA platforms and green tariffs from retailers provide alternative pathways to renewable sourcing.

Optimization StrategyEstimated Annual Benefit (100,000-1,000,000 kWh user)
Time-of-use optimization3-8% on total energy costs
Spot price shifting5-15% on wholesale component
Aggregator flexibility participation€2,000-€15,000/year
Energy efficiency investments10-30% on electricity use
Solar PV (self-consumption)20-40% grid purchase reduction
Combined strategy15-35% total cost reduction

Conclusion

Denmark's SME electricity market presents a paradox: normalized wholesale prices mask substantial complexity in network tariffs, regional variations, and emerging volatility sources. The 97 øre/kWh effective rate for a typical 500,000 kWh business conceals cost differences of 25% or more based on location alone—with Jutland-based SMEs paying significantly less than Copenhagen counterparts, and Bornholm businesses facing the highest tariffs.

Three key insights emerge for the Danish SME Energy Cost Index:

  1. Network tariffs now exceed wholesale costs for many SMEs during peak hours, making time-of-use optimization the highest-impact intervention. The 17:00-21:00 peak window costs up to 10x overnight rates.

  2. Regional arbitrage potential is substantial but underrecognized. An SME relocating from Copenhagen to Jutland could save ~20,000 DKK annually on a 100,000 kWh consumption profile—purely from network tariff differences.

  3. Flexibility is the emerging value stream. With PICASSO introducing €4,000+/MWh balancing prices and negative wholesale hours at record levels, SMEs with shiftable loads possess a monetizable asset that aggregators are actively seeking.

The 2026-2027 electricity tax reduction to EU minimum levels will provide universal relief, but the real competitive differentiation for Danish SMEs lies in understanding their sector-specific consumption profiles, leveraging regional tariff structures, and actively participating in the flexibility transition reshaping Nordic electricity markets.

Share this article

Use buttons or copy text to share

"New Analysis: The True Cost of Electricity for Danish SMEs"